Should I buy the CODE 95 W BOA in MV or LV?

By the shape of your foot — not by your ability, and not by budget, since Lange charges $749.95 either way. The last is the only axis Lange publishes a difference on: 100mm on the MV, which the manufacturer calls a wider fit, against 97mm on the LV, described as a race-inspired last for narrow feet; flex 95, the shell and cuff materials, the Core Custom 3 liner, the GripWalk sole and the 53° of walk range are printed the same on both. So a wider forefoot, a fuller instep or a high-volume midfoot argues for the MV, and a narrow, low-volume foot argues for the LV — a dial can close a shell, but it cannot take out space that is already in it. Two cautions: Lange's copy calls the LV extra-soft and the MV tuned for lighter skiers, yet both are published at flex 95 on identical hardware, so treat the adjectives as marketing; and 100mm is a relative figure, because Lange never says which shell size it was measured on, and brands quote a last at one reference shell and scale the rest of the run off it. The number tells you where this shell sits next to the LV and nothing more — only a fitting tells you what fits you.

What bindings does the CODE 95 W BOA MV work with?

Two interfaces, and they are not one system. Below, the rubber blocks at toe and heel have GRIP WALK and ISO 23223 molded right into them, and that marking is the standard your binding must be built to accept: one whose maker declares GripWalk (ISO 23223) support, or a MultiNorm/MN binding certified for both sole standards. An alpine binding certified for ISO 5355 soles only will not take this boot, and that is a safety limit rather than a comfort preference; whatever it does go into, the binding has to be matched to this sole type and the release values set and verified by a certified technician. For reference, the LOOK Pivot 2.0 11 GW we stock is listed by its maker as compatible with Alpine ISO 5355 and GripWalk ISO 23223 A soles, so it takes this boot and a race boot both; that is that binding's own dual certification, not a rule you can carry to the next binding. The pin inserts are the second interface and serve pin/tech touring bindings only, never the alpine binding on your skis; since Lange has published neither the insert positions nor any certification for them, which touring binding you can run is a question to settle with a technician, boot in hand.

How much does the CODE 95 W BOA MV weigh?

There is no official number to give you: the 26/27 catalog prints WIP in the weight column, meaning Lange itself has not settled the figure. The consequence is practical. This boot cannot be put on the scale against a rival, so if you are cross-shopping on grams, the comparison you want to make is not available — and we will not manufacture one by borrowing a number from another CODE model or from the RS line. On a boot whose pitch is that it walks up as well as it skis down, that is a real gap rather than a footnote.

Does the CODE 95 W BOA MV have a walk mode, and how good is it?

Yes: Active Blade, with 53° of range in the 26/27 catalog, plus a Friction Free Hinge that Lange credits for smoother skinning. How well it actually locks under load, we cannot tell you — the CODE line is new for 26/27 and no on-snow test of it has been published. Read the 53° for what the number is: enough for a boot pack or a short skin to a line, in a boot whose job is the way back down.

1 / 9

Pre-order

Lange

Lange CODE 95 W BOA MV GW Ski Boots

$749.95

Boots Return Policy

All boots are subject to a 5% restocking fee if returned. Please ensure correct sizing before purchasing — contact us for help with fit.

Size: 24.5

Pre-order · Ships September 2026

Free shipping $100+ 15-day returns Authorized dealer

Description

The Lange CODE 95 W BOA MV GW is a women's freeride boot on a 100mm medium-volume last, flex 95, with a BOA dial and a GripWalk sole. It is new for 26/27: Lange has not put the CODE line on its own website, and no independent on-snow test has been published yet. Nothing here is a ride report: it is read off the construction and Lange's catalog.

MV means medium volume, and Lange's word for this last is wider: 100mm, against 97mm for the LV version of the same boot. The shell is drawn for width across the forefoot, a fuller instep, volume through the midfoot. The BOA H+i1 dial replaces the lower buckles and closes that section evenly, right where a buckle digs into the instep — but a dial closes a shell; it does not create volume. Put a narrow, low-volume foot in a 100mm shell and the only move left is to crank the dial until the foot stops moving, which is how you manufacture pressure points and heel lift. That foot belongs in the LV. And the 100mm is not itself a promise: Lange does not print the shell size it was measured at, so it tells you this boot is wider than its twin, not that it fits you. A shell check settles that.

Flex 95 reads on Lange's scale only, and Lange tuned it for lighter skiers: the Dual Core shell is built to be bent, not leaned against. Inside is a Core Custom 3 customizable liner with PrimaLoft insulation, a 40mm strap, and Active Blade walk mode with 53° of range.

The sole is GripWalk, with ISO 23223 molded into the rubber blocks, so the binding has to declare GripWalk or MultiNorm support — a classic alpine binding cut for ISO 5355 soles alone is not a match. The tech pin inserts are a second, separate interface for pin bindings. Lange has not published a weight; the catalog still reads WIP. Bring the skis, or the binding's model name, and we will check the interface and fit the shell in store.

Details

Type: Ski Boots
Vendor: Lange
SKU: LBP7280-24.5

PTO ReviewSki Boots

Lange CODE 95 W BOA MV

CODE family · 26/27BOAWalk Mode

Flex 95

Stiff

60708090100110120130

SofterStiffer

Last Width

100mm— Medium (100–101mm)

Price the novelty in first. The CODE line is new for 26/27 — third-party consensus is that it replaces the XT3 Free, though Lange has announced nothing itself — and nobody has published an independent on-snow test of it, in any language we searched. So what follows is read off the catalog and the shell. If you want a boot with a season of reviews under it, this is not that boot yet.

The real decision here is not whether you are strong enough for it. It is whether your foot is the shape Lange drew it for. In the 26/27 catalog this boot comes on two lasts, MV at 100mm and LV at 97mm, and the catalog gives them the same flex, the same shell and cuff materials, the same liner, the same sole, the same 53° of walk. It gives them the same price too: $749.95 either way. So the choice costs you nothing except getting it right — which means it is settled by a fitting, not by a size chart. Lange's copy calls the LV extra-soft and this one tuned for lighter skiers, but both are published at flex 95 on identical hardware, so ignore the adjectives. One practical wrinkle: our MV run is 24.5 / 25.5 / 26.5 and our LV run is 23.5 / 24.5 / 25.5, so at 26.5 the shop has already made the choice for you.

Flex 95 is a design target, not a rating, and it is Lange's number — it does not line up with anyone else's 95. Lange's stated aim is progressive flex for lighter skiers, and that cuts both ways: it is the point of the boot if you are light, and it is the ceiling if you are not. A heavier or stronger skier who drives hard into the front will find the top of this flex sooner than she wants, and the answer inside the line is the CODE 115 W — which PTO does not stock this season, so do not plan around finding it on our shelf.

Then the bill for the walk mode. Active Blade, the Friction Free Hinge and a light Lyfran cuff are structure a race boot does not carry, and stiffness it does not hand back. If you never leave the piste, you are paying $749.95 for a mechanism you will never open, and Lange's own RS line is the honest answer — we stock it.

And the boot is only half of the purchase. It carries two interfaces, the GripWalk sole below and the tech pin inserts in the toe, and they are not one system — so the binding already sitting on your skis is not automatically part of this deal. Settle that before you pay rather than after. With the pins in particular, Lange has published neither the insert positions nor any certification for them, which makes touring-binding choice a technician's call, not a product page's.

Strengths

+100mm MV last drawn for a wider forefoot and fuller instep
+BOA H+i1 spreads the pull across the instep instead of clamping it
+Factory GripWalk sole and tech pin inserts: two separate interfaces
+Active Blade walk mode gives 53° of range for skinning
+Dual Core shell tuned so lighter skiers can actually bend it

Best For

Women with a medium-to-wide forefoot and a fuller instep who already ski off-piste and want one boot that skis down hard and still walks up — and who are light enough to bend a shell Lange tuned for lighter skiers. It also suits anyone tired of a lower buckle clamping across the instep, because the BOA spreads that pull instead of concentrating it.

Limitations

−Narrow, low-volume feet swim inside the 100mm shell
−No published weight — Lange prints WIP, so it cannot be weighed against a rival
−Nobody has published an on-snow test of the CODE line
−The GripWalk sole needs a GripWalk- or MultiNorm-rated binding
−Walk mode and light cuff cost stiffness a race boot keeps
−Buckle count, forward lean and ramp angle remain unpublished

Not For

Narrow, low-volume feet. A dial cannot delete volume that was never there, and cranking one until a loose foot stops moving only trades slop for pressure points and a lifting heel. The LV is the same boot at the same $749.95 on a 97mm last — this is the one place the MV loses, and it loses to its own twin. Also wrong for heavier, stronger skiers who load the front of the boot hard: Lange tuned this flex for lighter skiers, and the support ceiling sits in the CODE 115 W, which PTO does not stock this season. Wrong for skiers who never leave the piste and will never open the walk mode or use the pins; the RS line is built for that and we carry it. Wrong for anyone assuming a GripWalk sole drops into whatever binding is already on the ski — it does not. Wrong as a first boot bought without a fitting: Lange aims this at women already riding freeride terrain. And it is no help to anyone counting on a RECCO reflector — this boot has none, and a reflector is not avalanche safety equipment in any case.

Common Questions

Should I buy the CODE 95 W BOA in MV or LV?: By the shape of your foot — not by your ability, and not by budget, since Lange charges $749.95 either way. The last is the only axis Lange publishes a difference on: 100mm on the MV, which the manufacturer calls a wider fit, against 97mm on the LV, described as a race-inspired last for narrow feet; flex 95, the shell and cuff materials, the Core Custom 3 liner, the GripWalk sole and the 53° of walk range are printed the same on both. So a wider forefoot, a fuller instep or a high-volume midfoot argues for the MV, and a narrow, low-volume foot argues for the LV — a dial can close a shell, but it cannot take out space that is already in it. Two cautions: Lange's copy calls the LV extra-soft and the MV tuned for lighter skiers, yet both are published at flex 95 on identical hardware, so treat the adjectives as marketing; and 100mm is a relative figure, because Lange never says which shell size it was measured on, and brands quote a last at one reference shell and scale the rest of the run off it. The number tells you where this shell sits next to the LV and nothing more — only a fitting tells you what fits you.
What bindings does the CODE 95 W BOA MV work with?: Two interfaces, and they are not one system. Below, the rubber blocks at toe and heel have GRIP WALK and ISO 23223 molded right into them, and that marking is the standard your binding must be built to accept: one whose maker declares GripWalk (ISO 23223) support, or a MultiNorm/MN binding certified for both sole standards. An alpine binding certified for ISO 5355 soles only will not take this boot, and that is a safety limit rather than a comfort preference; whatever it does go into, the binding has to be matched to this sole type and the release values set and verified by a certified technician. For reference, the LOOK Pivot 2.0 11 GW we stock is listed by its maker as compatible with Alpine ISO 5355 and GripWalk ISO 23223 A soles, so it takes this boot and a race boot both; that is that binding's own dual certification, not a rule you can carry to the next binding. The pin inserts are the second interface and serve pin/tech touring bindings only, never the alpine binding on your skis; since Lange has published neither the insert positions nor any certification for them, which touring binding you can run is a question to settle with a technician, boot in hand.
How much does the CODE 95 W BOA MV weigh?: There is no official number to give you: the 26/27 catalog prints WIP in the weight column, meaning Lange itself has not settled the figure. The consequence is practical. This boot cannot be put on the scale against a rival, so if you are cross-shopping on grams, the comparison you want to make is not available — and we will not manufacture one by borrowing a number from another CODE model or from the RS line. On a boot whose pitch is that it walks up as well as it skis down, that is a real gap rather than a footnote.
Does the CODE 95 W BOA MV have a walk mode, and how good is it?: Yes: Active Blade, with 53° of range in the 26/27 catalog, plus a Friction Free Hinge that Lange credits for smoother skinning. How well it actually locks under load, we cannot tell you — the CODE line is new for 26/27 and no on-snow test of it has been published. Read the 53° for what the number is: enough for a boot pack or a short skin to a line, in a boot whose job is the way back down.